Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Nutrition · 1efd24fe Biology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports oral bacterial strains transmitted to the ileum and associations with local metabolites and PYY responses. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports oral bacterial strains transmitted to the ileum and associations with local metabolites and PYY responses.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Leans supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “The chickpea crossover study found evidence that oral bacterial strains reached the ileum after the meal, where their abundance was associated with local...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “In a randomized crossover study of ten participants, intact versus broken chickpea cellular structures produced different gastrointestinal metabolite and...” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The abstract reports oral bacterial strains transmitted to the ileum and associations with local metabolites and PYY responses.

  From Effect of dietary chickpea structures on the small intestine metabolome and microbiome: a randomised crossover trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The Imperial repository abstract corroborates the reported evidence of oral bacterial strains reaching the ileum and associating with local metabolites and PYY responses.

  From Effect of dietary chickpea structures on the gut metabolome and microbiome: A randomised cross over trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance STRONG Steps 1 Counted

  Institutional repository copy of the same study; corroborating source, not an independent participant sample.

• The excerpt directly reports oral bacterial strains transmitted to the ileum and associations with local metabolites and PYY responses.

  From Effect of dietary chickpea structures on the small intestine metabolome and microbiome: a randomised crossover trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The result comes from a ten-participant randomized study comparing intact and broken chickpea cellular structures, with ileal microbiota as a secondary outcome.

  From Effect of dietary chickpea structures on the small intestine metabolome and microbiome: a randomised crossover trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The paper describes evidence of oral-strain transmission and association with local metabolites and PYY, rather than a direct causal intervention on those strains.

  From Effect of dietary chickpea structures on the small intestine metabolome and microbiome: a randomised crossover trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The proposed food-bolus route and metabolic impact are presented as an interpretation suggested by the findings, not as proof of a causal mechanism.

  From Effect of dietary chickpea structures on the small intestine metabolome and microbiome: a randomised crossover trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
4911193f		d02ab9cb

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	57bb2e7f, d02ab9cb, bcd47dbc, e28283fb, 9c34852d

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
18840	APPENDED
18841	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
18850	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
18906	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24730	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25913	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)