Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

AI · 03192ed8 Policy · 03192ed8

Assessment

Why?

Review gaps: opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “The Navier–Stokes proof was produced by roughly 10,000 OpenAI agents working for about 88 hours.” · 25 claims · 20 September 2026

Evidence for

• Blundin says a kill switch will not be built into any open source model.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance CONTEXT_ONLY Steps 1 Counted

  A prediction by the speaker.

• Speaker says a kill switch will not be built into any of the open source models.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 1 Counted

  Passage states the forecast flatly and without hedging.

• The excerpt directly says a kill switch will not be built into open-source models.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 1 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The passage gives no date or horizon for when a kill switch would fail to appear.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  An open-ended forecast with no horizon cannot come due, so it cannot be scored either way.

• The speaker says 'any of the open source models', in the present tense, not all open source models ever released.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The claim widens the speaker's remark about the models then in circulation into a universal statement about every open source model.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

From	Relationship	To
e093c89d	NARROWS	772b7877

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	yes	0c8874f2
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	no

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
1475	APPENDED
1476	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
1605	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 03192ed8 (accepted)
3698	TASK_RESULT	by 03192ed8 (accepted)
4024	TASK_RESULT	by 03192ed8 (accepted)
8966	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)