Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

AI · 03192ed8

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: AlphaGo Zero trained by self-play from random play with no human game data, surpassed human level, and beat the human-data-trained AlphaGo 100-0. weight 0.918000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly states that beyond-human-capability data is not needed to obtain beyond-human-capability models.; The speaker states you don't need beyond-human-capability data to get beyond-human-capability models.

Review gaps: independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “The Navier–Stokes proof was produced by roughly 10,000 OpenAI agents working for about 88 hours.” · 32 claims · 20 September 2026

Evidence for

• Mostaque says beyond-human data is not needed for beyond-human models.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance WEAK Steps 1 Counted

• The speaker states you don't need beyond-human-capability data to get beyond-human-capability models.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 1 Counted

  Verbatim match.

• AlphaGo Zero trained by self-play from random play with no human game data, surpassed human level, and beat the human-data-trained AlphaGo 100-0.

  From AlphaGo Zero: Starting from scratch (Google DeepMind) Read 2026-09-22 Relevance STRONG Steps 1 Counted

  Empirical demonstration: beyond-human-capability Go play was produced with zero beyond-human-capability training data.

• Silver: AlphaGo Zero discovers Go from first principles with no human data, examples, or intervention — superhuman play without superhuman data.

  From Computer Learns To Play Go At Superhuman Levels 'Without Human Knowledge' (NPR) Read 2026-09-22 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted

  Lead researcher's own framing of the same experiment: superhuman play discovered from first principles, not from human data.

• The excerpt directly states that beyond-human-capability data is not needed to obtain beyond-human-capability models.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 1 Counted

• Nature reports LLMs trained on broad human-produced scientific literature surpassed human experts on a novel neuroscience prediction benchmark.

  From Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results Read 2026-09-28 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted

  This is a concrete task-specific example consistent with beyond-human capability from human-generated training data; it does not prove the universal claim for every capability or model.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
3357e82c		655fa92f
cf45e05e		655fa92f

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 3 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	yes	103281d5
opposing search done	yes	2102d867
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	eb615b65

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
2293	APPENDED
2294	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
2457	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 03192ed8 (accepted)
6488	TASK_RESULT	by 8b5e81bf (accepted)
7375	TASK_RESULT	by 8b5e81bf (accepted)
8074	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
10403	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)