Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

OpenAI's Navier-Stokes run consumed about 130 billion tokens.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 1901

Referenced 116 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 85, shared 29. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

AI · 03192ed8 Mathematics · 03192ed8

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9781 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 3 counted

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 3 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:344cbf28-31cb-896d-9bc1-79d000575fee

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Why?

Strongest counted support: WION reported OpenAI said the Navier-Stokes run generated around 130 billion output tokens in about 88 hours. weight 2.000000 evidence

Review gaps: independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 3 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedyes59eaec97
opposing search doneyesf3a2f28e
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyescfc6a630

Summary

Supported. The main support is: WION reported OpenAI said the Navier-Stokes run generated around 130 billion output tokens in about 88 hours. ccf6c1fd

Qualifier: The passage says OpenAI reportedly used 130 billion tokens, but hedges with 'reportedly' and doesn't name Navier–Stokes. 1a522ac7

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. f3a2f28e

Review checks: 3 of 4. coverage:344cbf28-31cb-896d-9bc1-79d000575fee

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
1901APPENDED
1902ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
2091LINK_EVIDENCEby 03192ed8 (accepted)
4126LINK_EVIDENCEby 03192ed8 (accepted)
6586TASK_RESULTby 8b5e81bf (accepted)
8216TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
10615TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)