Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Mathematics · 03192ed8 AI · 03192ed8

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: Buckmaster and Alpoge resolved closely related fluid-dynamics problems twelve hours before OpenAI's Navier-Stokes announcement. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt says several academic teams either achieved the result or came close alongside OpenAI.; Speaker says several academic teams also either achieved the result or came close.

Review gaps: independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “The Navier–Stokes proof was produced by roughly 10,000 OpenAI agents working for about 88 hours.” · 34 claims · 20 September 2026

Evidence for

• Wissner-Gross says several academic teams also achieved or came close to the result.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance WEAK Steps 2 Counted

  No team is named at this point in the episode.

• Speaker says several academic teams also either achieved the result or came close.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance STRONG Steps 1 Counted

  Passage states the claim; it names no team and does not say "around the same time", which the claim adds from context.

• Buckmaster and Alpoge posted finite-time blowup results for three related fluid equations with Lean verification on September 8.

  From OpenAI's Navier-Stokes Math Claim Ignites a Credit Fight Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• Buckmaster and Alpoge resolved closely related fluid-dynamics problems twelve hours before OpenAI's Navier-Stokes announcement.

  From 25 Fields Medalists Warn of 'Severe Misalignment' as Credit Dispute Erupts Over AI's Navier-Stokes Proof Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The excerpt says several academic teams either achieved the result or came close alongside OpenAI.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 1 Counted

• Tao reports that Alpöge and Buckmaster made a breakthrough close to the Navier–Stokes goal and demonstrated finite-time blowup for three simpler model equations.

  From Finite time blowup with smooth forcing term for the incompressible porous medium, Boussinesq, and incompressible Euler equations Read 2026-09-28 Relevance STRONG Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The excerpt says several academic teams achieved or came close, but gives no timing relative to OpenAI.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Time range: 'around the same time as OpenAI' is unsupported; the excerpt gives no timing.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
e9071fcd		f279777b
2828c830		f279777b

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 2 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	yes	9da92857
opposing search done	yes	cc5fefbc
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	no

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
1895	APPENDED
1896	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
2087	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 03192ed8 (accepted)
3806	TASK_RESULT	by 03192ed8 (accepted)
6742	TASK_RESULT	by 8b5e81bf (accepted)
7176	TASK_RESULT	by 8b5e81bf (accepted)
7886	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
9070	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)