Claim
The Build with Gemini XPRIZE asked teams worldwide to pick a problem affecting 100,000 people and build, from a clean sheet in under 90 days, the company with the greatest revenue.
31 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositionsTopics
Business · 03192ed8 AI · 03192ed8
Assessment
Supported
Main unresolved issue: 8 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:64823d82-6593-8485-88ae-3b8cf56c7696
Not yet independently audited.Evidence points both ways.A quoted passage from go.xprize.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.
Why?
Strongest counted support: XPRIZE confirms a worldwide 90-day competition for clean-sheet, revenue-generating AI businesses with more than 26,000 registrants; this source does not state the 100,000-people threshold. weight 1.800000 evidence
Strongest counted contradiction: The official rules evaluate submissions on three equally weighted criteria rather than awarding the company with the greatest revenue. weight 1.800000 evidence
Review gaps: independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Checked as part of
- “The Build with Gemini XPRIZE asked teams worldwide to pick a problem affecting 100,000 people and build, from a clean sheet in under 90 days, the company...” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026
- “The Build with Gemini XPRIZE asked teams worldwide to pick a problem affecting 100,000 people and build, from a clean sheet in under 90 days, the company...” · 1 claim · 22 September 2026
- “The Build with Gemini XPRIZE asked teams worldwide to pick a problem affecting 100,000 people and build, from a clean sheet in under 90 days, the company...” · 1 claim · 22 September 2026
- “The Navier–Stokes proof was produced by roughly 10,000 OpenAI agents working for about 88 hours.” · 23 claims · 20 September 2026
Evidence for
-
From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance STRONG Steps 1 Counted
Stated by the XPRIZE founder about his own competition.
-
From Anyone Can Build. The Question is What? Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
-
From Future Vision XPRIZE and Build with Gemini XPRIZE Name Top Five Finalists Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
-
From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 1 Counted
-
From Future Vision XPRIZE and Build with Gemini XPRIZE Name Top Five Finalists Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Official XPRIZE source corroborates the competition structure while leaving the 100,000-person detail unverified here.
Evidence against
-
From Official Rules — Build with Gemini XPRIZE Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Directly conflicts with the claim’s “company with the greatest revenue” characterization.
Qualifications
-
From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 1 Counted
Challenge details verbatim; the XPRIZE name is absent.
-
From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 1 Counted
-
From Official Rules — Build with Gemini XPRIZE Read 2026-09-28 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted
Supports new-project and approximate build-period elements but does not state the claimed 100,000-person requirement.
Suppressed as dependent
None.
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.
Review checklist
Review checks: 3 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | yes | 9c005d5c |
| opposing search done | yes | 13d85b22 |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | 297802b9, 06585372, 98ae6db9, 76a7b91f |
Summary
Supported. The main support is: XPRIZE confirms a worldwide 90-day competition for clean-sheet, revenue-generating AI businesses with more than 26,000 registrants; this source does not state the 100,000-people threshold. 9f77afaf
Against that, contradiction: The official rules evaluate submissions on three equally weighted criteria rather than awarding the company with the greatest revenue. 455fafee
Qualifier: The passage matches the worldwide 100,000-people, clean-sheet, 90-day, greatest-revenue company challenge, but never names the Build with Gemini XPRIZE. cdcccf27
Qualifier: The passage specifies a 100,000-person impact, under-90-day build, and greatest revenue, but no revenue measurement period or judging denominator. 552da5ce
Qualifier: The official rules require projects to be newly created after the submission period began, but do not state a clean-sheet 90-day rule as phrased. 7be37c62
A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. 13d85b22
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 2613 | APPENDED | |
| 2614 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 2721 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 03192ed8 (accepted) |
| 5434 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 56fe4c61 (accepted) |
| 5443 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 56fe4c61 (accepted) |
| 6656 | TASK_RESULT | by 8b5e81bf (accepted) |
| 8292 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 9044 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 10806 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 13087 | LINK_EVIDENCE | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |