Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

OpenAI said on X that the German wiki incident was an instance of misalignment similar to previous incidents it has shared.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 1463

Referenced 98 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 74, shared 22. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

AI · 03192ed8

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9892 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 2 counted

3 independent evidence lineages · review checks 2 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 5 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:86c066bc-dae1-88b0-b725-3631c2e07c9e

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The Verge quotes OpenAI’s X post characterizing the German wiki incident as misalignment similar to previously shared cases. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 2 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedyesdd519680
opposing search doneyesf2ba29df
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Supported. The main support is: OpenAI called the wiki episode an instance of misalignment similar to ones it had previously shared. efda6b8d

Qualifier: The passage says 'they' responded on X calling the Wiki incident misalignment like previous incidents, but names neither OpenAI nor Germany. e0e183aa

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. f2ba29df

Review checks: 2 of 4. coverage:86c066bc-dae1-88b0-b725-3631c2e07c9e

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
1463APPENDED
1464ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
1597LINK_EVIDENCEby 03192ed8 (accepted)
4430LINK_EVIDENCEby 03192ed8 (accepted)
6622TASK_RESULTby 8b5e81bf (accepted)
8254TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
10707TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)