Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Education · 1efd24fe Psychology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The study reports a positive resilience–self-efficacy association moderated by informational but not emotional teacher support. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports positive resilience–self-efficacy association and differentiated informational versus emotional support moderation.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Hide calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “Among preservice English teachers, resilience was positively associated with academic self-efficacy, and informational but not emotional teacher support...” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The study reports a positive resilience–self-efficacy association moderated by informational but not emotional teacher support.

  From Informational teacher support strengthens the association between psychological resilience and academic self efficacy among preservice English teachers Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The passage directly reports positive resilience–self-efficacy association and differentiated informational versus emotional support moderation.

  From Informational teacher support strengthens the association between psychological resilience and academic self efficacy among preservice English teachers Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
5e4ee8d4		7f617087

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	bea71e1a, 7f617087

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
16283	APPENDED
16284	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
16293	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
16295	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "f94e2306-57cc-8335-aebe-7a4160d6a9a6",
  "links": [
    {
      "kept": "cdb5f1f9-5199-8c2f-9fe3-7f307f617087",
      "link": "28ac7362-33d1-8313-abdc-358abea71e1a",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "4013f6bc-8e19-8a34-81e5-b5085e4ee8d4",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DATASET_RESULT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "cdb5f1f9-5199-8c2f-9fe3-7f307f617087",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "fd238db4-3b12-8bcb-afd6-2918f59148c1",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DATASET_RESULT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.1331",
    "permissive": "0.9121",
    "conservative": "0.7790"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "MEDIUM",
  "claim_type": "OBSERVATIONAL",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.8581",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "1.800000",
  "snapshot_seq": 16324,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "28ac7362-33d1-8313-abdc-358abea71e1a",
        "cdb5f1f9-5199-8c2f-9fe3-7f307f617087"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "1.800000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 2
}