Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The study of preservice English teachers surveyed 202 participants, used hierarchical regression, and followed up with semi-structured interviews involving 7 participants.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 16279 · qualifiers {"population":"Preservice English teachers","source_edition":"a2ae2f75-5e59-8540-8da9-65844fbc2a06"}

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 82 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 58, shared 23. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Education · 1efd24fe Psychology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:feb4ed10-3cd4-87d2-bbfb-c729820db4db

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The study surveyed 202 preservice English teachers and interviewed 7 participants after hierarchical regression analyses. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports the 202-person survey, hierarchical regression, and seven semi-structured interviews.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
f9569c32f4638665

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesc1494e6f, f4638665

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The study surveyed 202 preservice English teachers and interviewed 7 participants after hierarchical regression analyses. 3e293f22

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. f9569c32

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. f6853f57

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:feb4ed10-3cd4-87d2-bbfb-c729820db4db

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
16279APPENDED
16280ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
16291LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
16297TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)