Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Revised

Superseded at seq 5547 by bhoult: Emad Mostaque's Champion proposal allocates 10% of a local AI and robotics company's equity to residents under 21 and issues additional equity to children born later. · reason: The proposal specifies equity in the locally owned Champion company, with 10% allocated to under-21 residents and annual issuance for children born later; 'every child owns equity in the robots' and a single nominal valuation obscure these terms.. This entry stays in the log; the current claim is the revision.

Emad Mostaque put forward a Champion proposal in which every child owns equity in the robots at a nominal pre-money valuation.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: SUPERSEDED · created seq 3121

Referenced 97 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 94, shared 2. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Economics · 03192ed8 AI · 03192ed8

Assessment

Insufficient evidence

0 of 4 review checks done · 0 counted

0 independent evidence lineages · review checks 0 of 4 · stability n/a

Main unresolved issue: 1 counted evidence item has no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:26780795-30b8-8d50-90be-cc6afa428644

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Why?

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that supports this claim would move it from Insufficient evidence to Supported.

Hide calculation

No probability. No counted evidence bears on this claim at this snapshot.

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:c9c76c792d9d1941fc3f9a4241f067849d765e7b8afb7935963c1f67ac2208dc

Last changed at entry seq 5548; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

LinkWorkingWeightCounted as
93aab293 support relevance STRONG 1.2 × observation EYEWITNESS 0.4 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance SELF 0.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 0.000000 0.000000

prior — → log-odds —

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Insufficient evidence. No counted evidence bears on this claim yet. coverage:26780795-30b8-8d50-90be-cc6afa428644

Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:26780795-30b8-8d50-90be-cc6afa428644

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
3121APPENDED
3122ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
3249LINK_EVIDENCEby 03192ed8 (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "26780795-30b8-8d50-90be-cc6afa428644",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "07a4e4ac-3dc7-897c-9405-49cf93aab293",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "2d3fdd5c-8c68-809a-98a3-6d9912a8c706",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.000000",
      "relevance": "STRONG",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "SELF",
      "observation": "EYEWITNESS",
      "source_type": "VIDEO",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": null,
  "variants": null,
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": null,
  "claim_type": "OBSERVATIONAL",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": null,
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": null,
  "snapshot_seq": 5548,
  "prior_log_odds": null,
  "support_groups": 0,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.00",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": null,
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 1
}