Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Modern · 03192ed8 Theology · 03192ed8

Assessment

Why?

Suppressed as dependent: Wissner-Gross says Fedorov, a Russian cosmist, argued for ancestor simulations and digital resurrection.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that supports this claim would move it from Insufficient evidence to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “The Russian cosmist Nikolai Fedorov argued for creating ancestor simulations and digitally resurrecting everyone who has ever lived.” · 1 claim · 22 September 2026
• “The Navier–Stokes proof was produced by roughly 10,000 OpenAI agents working for about 88 hours.” · 15 claims · 20 September 2026

Evidence for

• Wissner-Gross says Fedorov, a Russian cosmist, argued for ancestor simulations and digital resurrection.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted

• Wissner-Gross says Fedorov, a Russian cosmist, argued for ancestor simulations and digital resurrection.

  From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance WEAK Steps 1 Counted

  Speaker attributes this to Fedorov but hedges it himself as 'using modern language', so the passage supports a modern gloss rather than what Fedorov wrote. No Fedorov text is quoted.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The encyclopedia describes Fedorov's common task as universal physical resurrection through future science and technology.

  From Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov (1829—1903) Read 2026-09-22 Relevance STRONG Steps 1 Counted

  This supports universal resurrection but distinguishes physical resurrection from the claim's digital resurrection and ancestor simulations; those are modern glosses.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
dd53ae3a		f8887bf0

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author. No independent review yet. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	no

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
1291	APPENDED
1292	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
1363	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 03192ed8 (accepted)
4005	TASK_RESULT	by 03192ed8 (accepted)
5191	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 56fe4c61 (accepted)