Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Coase's answer was that transactions are expensive, making it cheaper to hire employees than to negotiate every task on the open market, so companies are a workaround for transaction costs.

Type TEXTUAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 3347

30 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a comma-separated series may list several propositionsan inference word joins a premise to a conclusion; consider separate claims and an edge

Referenced 160 times: checked 3, looked up by assistants 1, viewed 101, shared 55. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Economics · 03192ed8 Business · 03192ed8

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9859 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 3 counted

3 independent evidence lineages · review checks 3 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 8 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:473609c2-f347-82ba-9d86-5b2bfc181a2f

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage from nobelprize.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Why?

Strongest counted support: Coase’s Nobel lecture defines transaction costs and says avoiding costly market transactions can explain why firms coordinate internally. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage says transactions are expensive, so hiring employees beats negotiating every task on the open market; companies work around transaction costs.; The excerpt says transactions involve finding people, negotiating, and enforcing contracts; hiring employees is cheaper than negotiating every task on the open market, and companies are a workaround for transaction costs.

Review gaps: independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
3052ffda469d6c98
e29289fd469d6c98

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 3 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedyes8dacb5c6
opposing search doneyes12f15715
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes52338ff9, 8c1ff461, 24a95654, d0b78c6b, a08c42f6

Summary

Supported. The main support is: Coase held that a firm arises where coordinating inside it costs less than using the market. a86dc5cd

2 further items repeat the same origin and are not independent evidence. 3052ffdae29289fd

Qualifier: Coase frames firm formation as a conditional cost comparison, with expansion bounded by internal versus market transaction costs. c4bf7048

Qualifier: Coase defines transaction costs through price discovery, negotiation, contracting, inspection, and dispute settlement. 3ee968f2

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. 12f15715

Review checks: 3 of 4. coverage:473609c2-f347-82ba-9d86-5b2bfc181a2f

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
3347APPENDED
3348ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
3513LINK_EVIDENCEby 03192ed8 (accepted)
4667LINK_EVIDENCEby e82bf250 (accepted)
6506TASK_RESULTby 8b5e81bf (accepted)
8098TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
10460TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
13259LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
15194TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)