Claim

The Nobel Prize is typically awarded for work done about 30 years earlier.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 1957

Referenced 199 times: checked 3, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 141, shared 55. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Science · 03192ed8 Modern · 03192ed8

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9991 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 3 counted

5 independent evidence lineages · review checks 3 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 10 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:c6a07f4c-4608-8cc7-a3c3-a5630d266620

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Related: NARROWS incoming: Supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: Across the three science prizes, chemistry has the longest Nobel lag at an average of 30 years, and physiology or medicine the shortest at 26. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: Speaker repeats a co-host's point that the Nobel Prize is given out for work done 30 years ago.; The excerpt says the Nobel Prize is given for work done 30 years ago.

Review gaps: independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Hide calculation

0.9991 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 3 of 4 · stability HIGH · 10 sources, 5 independent lineages

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:d51aecde7bccea2b97f8956fd057bd4e2e005dbf57878508ac3f5e9034421bfa

Last changed at entry seq 14499; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
a50d0cca support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
08f1bb13 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
9de40aae support	relevance WEAK 0.2 × observation HEARSAY 0.1 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance SELF 0.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.000000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept b24f9252)
34f30b75 qualify	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance SELF 0.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.000000	0.000000 (non directional)
b850c746 support	relevance MODERATE 0.6 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.540000	0.540000
309f7b3d support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
b7fcb2d1 support	relevance STRONG 1.2 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.080000	1.080000
b24f9252 support	relevance WEAK 0.2 × observation HEARSAY 0.1 × interpretation 2 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 2 0.700000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance SELF 0.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.000000	0.000000
13c32696 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance SELF 0.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.000000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept b24f9252)
32b4fa2b qualify	relevance MODERATE 0.6 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.459000	0.000000 (non directional)

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 7.020000 (the counted weights) = 7.020000 → probability 0.9991

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.9927 to 0.9999, a spread of 0.0072.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“The Nobel Prize is typically awarded for work done about 30 years earlier.” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026
“The Nobel Prize is typically awarded for work done about 30 years earlier.” · 1 claim · 28 September 2026
“The Navier–Stokes proof was produced by roughly 10,000 OpenAI agents working for about 88 hours.” · 34 claims · 20 September 2026

Evidence for

Diamandis says the Nobel Prize is given out for work done 30 years ago.

From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance WEAK Steps 2 Counted

A round figure offered in passing with no data.
Speaker repeats a co-host's point that the Nobel Prize is given out for work done 30 years ago.

From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance WEAK Steps 1 Counted

Passage states the 30-year figure, but as one host restating another's remark in passing, with no data behind it; this is a checkable statistic that should rest on prize records rather than the podcast.
Across the three science prizes, chemistry has the longest Nobel lag at an average of 30 years, and physiology or medicine the shortest at 26.

From Nobel Prizes Are Taking Longer to Award Groundbreaking Research Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The average time between a Nobel-worthy discovery and the award varies from 20 to 30 years, depending on the award category.

From 12 Surprising Facts about Nobel Prizes Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The excerpt says the Nobel Prize is given for work done 30 years ago.

From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 1 Counted
The study reports average Nobel recognition delays near 30 years for chemistry, physics, and medicine in 2010–2019.

From The Nobel Prize time gap Read 2026-09-28 Relevance STRONG Steps 0 Counted

Directly supports the general claim that Nobel-recognized work is often roughly three decades old, especially in recent natural-science cohorts.
The study reports 25% of laureates waited 21–30 years and 18% waited over 30 years.

From The Nobel Prize time gap Read 2026-09-28 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted

Shows substantial but not majority shares waiting 21–30 or over 30 years; the word typically is a broad summary rather than a universal rule.
Peer-reviewed research finds that Nobel recognition commonly lags major scientific work by decades and that the lag has increased over time in the natural sciences.

From The Nobel Prize time gap Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Open-access study with explicit discipline-level lag estimates.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

The 30-year figure is one speaker's offhand remark in a rant; the excerpt never says 'typically'.

From OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes Read 2026-09-20 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

The claim adds 'typically,' a generality the source does not state.
A peer-reviewed analysis finds Nobel recognition lags vary substantially by discipline: economics averaged 28 years overall, while recent-decade chemistry, physics, and medicine averages reached about 28–30 years.

From The Nobel Prize time gap Read 2026-09-28 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted

This supports the broad late-recognition idea but qualifies “typically about 30 years”: across all laureates and fields, many waits were 11–20 years and discipline averages differ.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
096169f5		b24f9252
ceca3dde		b24f9252

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

From	Relationship	To
03ff8c7a	NARROWS	0d266620

Review checklist

Review checks: 3 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	yes	b7da9545
opposing search done	yes	ef5e6f61
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	b850c746, b7fcb2d1, 32b4fa2b

Summary

Supported. The main support is: Across the three science prizes, chemistry has the longest Nobel lag at an average of 30 years, and physiology or medicine the shortest at 26. fd9b87cb

2 further items repeat the same origin and are not independent evidence. 096169f5ceca3dde

Qualifier: The 30-year figure is one speaker's offhand remark in a rant; the excerpt never says 'typically'. bdab0ab9

Qualifier: A peer-reviewed analysis finds Nobel recognition lags vary substantially by discipline: economics averaged 28 years overall, while recent-decade chemistry, physics, and medicine averages reached about 28–30 years. 45286f8c

A narrower version of this claim is supported. 03ff8c7a

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. ef5e6f61

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
1957	APPENDED
1958	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
2121	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 03192ed8 (accepted)
3816	TASK_RESULT	by 03192ed8 (accepted)
6752	TASK_RESULT	by 8b5e81bf (accepted)
7186	TASK_RESULT	by 8b5e81bf (accepted)
7898	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
9347	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
12729	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
14498	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "c6a07f4c-4608-8cc7-a3c3-a5630d266620",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "0dabe54f-a5cd-8179-8264-9053a50d0cca",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "0d240d4c-d164-88db-b3f1-01a3fd9b87cb",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "WEBSITE",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "274ed377-4b9d-8c77-9f20-dfb008f1bb13",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "b2cc0142-3d85-8f9c-b1fe-22e482c6927a",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "d9a3d9e8-ae6d-810d-aa35-5565b24f9252",
      "link": "50fe7f89-07d5-81a7-a969-0bc49de40aae",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "b3877093-5c44-8ced-acdd-e1f4096169f5",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.000000",
      "relevance": "WEAK",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "SELF",
      "observation": "HEARSAY",
      "source_type": "VIDEO",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    },
    {
      "link": "76c20dd6-efbf-8c05-9d94-821234f30b75",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "5eaeecfd-2945-8ea8-ba0f-4168bdab0ab9",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "0.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "SELF",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "VIDEO",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "a2269b59-d8af-832f-afd4-354bb850c746",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "0b960953-7575-82e2-875d-3e6e37944225",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.540000",
      "relevance": "MODERATE",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.540000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "bef2d454-e72a-85ac-a764-bccf309f7b3d",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "2bfc7258-39b4-88d1-804a-8524f8007b15",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "WEBSITE",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "d451afa5-b3a8-8ce1-a00d-8b34b7fcb2d1",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "9caba0af-4be9-8867-9b56-a77778ea4063",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.080000",
      "relevance": "STRONG",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.080000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "d9a3d9e8-ae6d-810d-aa35-5565b24f9252",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "0b87daed-8372-8b96-aace-cbff48b07299",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.000000",
      "relevance": "WEAK",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "SELF",
      "observation": "HEARSAY",
      "source_type": "VIDEO",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 2
    },
    {
      "kept": "d9a3d9e8-ae6d-810d-aa35-5565b24f9252",
      "link": "e15883b4-8afb-8405-bf7d-79f313c32696",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "398350e9-020d-8d44-b71f-f2e7ceca3dde",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "SELF",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "VIDEO",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    },
    {
      "link": "ea66eccd-6800-810e-9eac-fc0f32b4fa2b",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "a74d8377-3d2f-8808-9298-da7045286f8c",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "0.459000",
      "relevance": "MODERATE",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0072",
    "permissive": "0.9999",
    "conservative": "0.9927"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "HIGH",
  "claim_type": "OBSERVATIONAL",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.9991",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "7.020000",
  "snapshot_seq": 14499,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 5,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.75",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "01a0bc50-b48b-7990-b9b0-bb8eb7da9545"
      ],
      "ok": true
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [
        "01a0bc50-b47a-7f27-9b10-1364ef5e6f61"
      ],
      "ok": true
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "a2269b59-d8af-832f-afd4-354bb850c746",
        "d451afa5-b3a8-8ce1-a00d-8b34b7fcb2d1",
        "ea66eccd-6800-810e-9eac-fc0f32b4fa2b"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "7.020000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 10
}