Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

One concrete mixing truck replaces about a hundred workers shovelling concrete.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 3101

Referenced 147 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 109, shared 36. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Employment · 03192ed8 Technology · 03192ed8

Assessment

Contradicted

Score: 0.1419 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 2 counted

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 2 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:0cfa92dc-50fb-8520-8e6f-d84a660f2b35

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Why?

Strongest counted contradiction: This source describes a one-operator mixer replacing a three-to-four-worker process, not roughly one hundred workers. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: Speaker states one concrete mixing truck replaces about a hundred workers shovelling concrete.; The excerpt says one concrete mixing truck replaces about one hundred workers shovelling concrete.

Review gaps: independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that supports this claim would move it from Contradicted to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
941005998f2e6e79
0b5bfe918f2e6e79

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 2 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedyesd2cafb01
opposing search doneyese730c3d5
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Contradicted. The main contradiction is: This source describes a one-operator mixer replacing a three-to-four-worker process, not roughly one hundred workers. a719a3b9

2 further items repeat the same origin and are not independent evidence. 941005990b5bfe91

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. e730c3d5

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. e730c3d5

Review checks: 2 of 4. coverage:0cfa92dc-50fb-8520-8e6f-d84a660f2b35

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
3101APPENDED
3102ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
3237LINK_EVIDENCEby 03192ed8 (accepted)
3967TASK_RESULTby 03192ed8 (accepted)
7992TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
9524LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)