Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Mind uploading will be solved within the next few years.

Type FORECAST · truth-evaluable: no (UNRESOLVED_FORECAST) · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 1295

Referenced 86 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 83, shared 2. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Technology · 03192ed8 Neuroscience · 03192ed8

Assessment

Not assessed

2 of 4 review checks done · 2 counted

0 independent evidence lineages · review checks 2 of 4 · stability n/a

This is a forecast that has not resolved yet.

Main unresolved issue: 7 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:0cb10786-e78c-8631-9253-0f2322591ddf

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage is in something this server does not read, such as a PDF or a recording, so it has not been checked here.

Why?

Review gaps: independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 2 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedyes6d6ce769
opposing search doneyesace1c40c
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Not assessed. This is a forecast that has not resolved yet. coverage:0cb10786-e78c-8631-9253-0f2322591ddf

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. ace1c40c

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. ace1c40c

Review checks: 2 of 4. coverage:0cb10786-e78c-8631-9253-0f2322591ddf

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
1295APPENDED
1296ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
1365LINK_EVIDENCEby 03192ed8 (accepted)
3692TASK_RESULTby 03192ed8 (accepted)
3902TASK_RESULTby 03192ed8 (accepted)
3914TASK_RESULTby 03192ed8 (accepted)
8954TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)